BoLS logo Tabletop, RPGs & Pop Culture

Tactics: High Command – Victory Points and Captures

7 Minute Read
Aug 31 2014
Courtesy of Privateer Press Digital. Used with Permission.

High Command has markedly evolved over the past 12 months. Here is just a taste of how great it has become!

It is nearly an unrecognizable monster when judged in proximity to its humble beginnings. When the core sets were released, the external metagame consisted merely of selecting your detachments and accompanying warcasters/warlocks. The strongest combinations were quickly identified, and, had it been left unattended, High Command could have stagnated very quickly and been abandoned.

When High Command initially launched, it was not a game that was exactly weighted with loads of viable, competitive options, but things have changed. Both the Warmachine and Hordes sides of the game have received five and four expansions respectively that have allowed us to move beyond the uncomplicated exercise of simply choosing detachments and warcasters or warlocks. Now we can shape detachments individually to best fit the strategy that we wish to pursue. So, today we will start taking a look at the game beyond the simple rules that govern playing it, trying to tease out the complexity in a way that people might find new or create renewed interest in the game. This first article, in what I hope will lead to many, will deal specifically with the concepts of Victory Points in detachment composition and when to let your opponent capture a location.
Before moving on, if you are completely unfamiliar with how High Command is played, I highly suggest that you watch Privateer Press’s fantastic tutorial on YouTube. It is a bit on the lengthy side, but it is quite comprehensive and a great resource if you are considering getting into the game. Alternatively, you can check out our original review and walkthrough from last year.

The first really important thing to understand with building your detachments and playing the game is the win condition, which is to have the most Victory Points when the Day of Reckoning card is flipped from the Winds of War deck. This effectively gives you between ten and fourteen turns to gain VPs through two means: purchasing or rushing cards from your reserves that have a VP value and capturing locations.

Courtesy of Privateer Press Digital. Used with Permission.

Victory Points on detachment cards themselves make detachment construction somewhat of a balancing act, particularly where cards that are not worth any Victory Points are concerned. This makes serviceable cards that are worth two Victory Points fairly important and often extremely prevalent. Cards with great value that are also worth two Victory Points are consequently present in most any faction deck, with strong examples including the Feral Warpwolf, Cyclone, Behemoth, or a combination of Carniveans, Scytheans, or Ravogores depending on overall composition.

Cards that are worth a single Victory Point tend to make up the core of detachments since they are in greater abundance than their betters, starting most notably with the generic 4/4, 3/1, and 1/3 resource cards. Individual factions will have different flavors of single-VP cards here, especially so when theme is concerned. As someone who spends most of his time with Cygnar, Trencher Commandos, Hunters, and Storm Lances are among my favorites, but there are loads of viable options.

This leaves us with detachment cards without a Victory Point value. In my experience, these cards tend to make up the smallest percentage of my detachments since I typically want to be scoring Victory Points every turn, even if I cannot capture a location. For a card without a VP value to make it into a deck, it really has to bring something strong to the table. In some cases, these cards will often be the 3/3 Resource cards that provide 5/5 for Colossals or Battle Engines or the 2/2 Resource cards with faction-specific abilities. Non-resource cards are a little trickier, but common favorites for me seem to be Arcane Tempest Gun Mages, Journeyman Warcasters, and Trencher Heavy Artillery Teams.

Courtesy of Privateer Press Digital. Used with Permission.

Now, the recommended minimum for your deck’s Victory Point count is going to vary widely depending on who you ask, and can also differ by faction choice. This is mostly due to the fact that High Command is a game that has only recently come into its own, and it lacks the huge online communities that you would find for other games, particularly for those with online play options that allow its denizens to distill the most optimal combinations down through the sheer brute force of mass volume of play. That said, I typically try to shoot for 36 Victory Points in my combined detachments. Since I have 36 cards in my detachments to customize, this means that the majority of the cards that I run will be worth at least 1 VP, and for every card that is worth 2 VP or more, it opens my build up to those non-scoring cards that I might otherwise avoid. Sometimes I am able to get well above 36 Victory Points, but it is not always the case.

It is also worth adding that the effects of the Location and Winds of War decks from Invasion of Sul are still being felt, one of them being a seeming impetus for running some of the really cheap, non-scoring rushing cards. The previews for Castle of the Keys have a similar tone about them, but only time will tell how this all shakes out.

The next thing that I feel is really important to the game is understanding when to let an opponent capture a location and when to contest the attempt. Making this type of decision depends on a lot of important factors:

  1. Has my opponent invested several cards with high purchase power and strong stats into the attempt?
  2. How many Victory Points is the location worth, what type of purchasing power does it have, and how will the location’s special ability play into the rest of the game?
  3. What are my current purchase/rush options in terms of Victory Points gained?
  4. What will it take to contest the location?
  5. How late into the game is it?
If the answer to the first question is “yes”, then letting it go may not be a bad idea. Now that character warjacks, warbeasts, gargantuans, and colossals are in the game, you will most likely see them on the table often due to both their high Victory Points as well as their considerable resource value. If a Behemoth is sitting on a location with two other high value cards, it may not necessarily be a bad idea just to let the location get captured, particularly if the value of the location itself is not terribly high. The reason for this is that cards used to capture a location go to the Occupying Forces pile, which is the High Command equivalent of being put into exile and out of the game. Yes, their VP value still adds to the total at game’s end, but for the remainder of the game, that Behemoth cannot be exploited for either its stats or impressive resource value.
Courtesy of Privateer Press Digital. Used with Permission.
Many who have spent time with collectible card games are probably familiar with the concept of “card advantage”, and if not, the provided link should help. Such a concept does exist in High Command, albeit in a limited manner since you always have at least six cards in your hand after drawing. Card advantage can be slightly manipulated through the banking mechanics as well as through forced discard, but this is all really beside the point I am trying to get at, specifically the concept of what I call “resource advantage”. Resource advantage is gained by purchasing cards with high resource values while culling out cards with low resource values. As mentioned earlier, when a player captures a location, any card present is moved to occupying forces. Depending on the volume of cards used in the capture and their inherent resource value, allowing another player to capture a location can lead to that player losing resource advantage. Savvy players will try to capture locations with low value cards that lack serious resource value, but this may not always be possible, under which circumstances serious thought should be given.
Something else to consider is what can you gain by simply letting the location go. If you can trade a 5 VP location to your opponent for rushing a pair of 2 VP cards to another location, you may very well end up coming ahead. For example, if my opponent has a Ravagore, a Scythean, and a Throne of Everblight holding Location A, and Location B is unoccupied, I could attempt to wrestle control of Location A away from my opponent at the cost of all of my resources, or I could simply let Location A go (along with its high-resource occupants), and rush cards with VP values to Location B to get a foothold there. 
Knowing exactly when to do all of this is difficult. There are a lot of factors to weigh here, and having a good idea of what the current score is will help you out a lot. On that subject, if you plan on starting to play High Command regularly, look into a score keeper smartphone app. There are loads of free, easy-to-use ones out there for every platform.

This wraps up this short discussion on VPs and locations. Stay tuned to Bell of Lost Souls for more articles on High Command in the very near future!

Author: relasine
  • High Command: Gargantuan Might - Trollblood and Circle Orboros Review